"ttyymmnn" (ttyymmnn)
04/13/2016 at 17:30 • Filed to: None
11
10|
"ttyymmnn" (ttyymmnn)
04/13/2016 at 17:30 • Filed to: None | 11
| 10 |
vondon302
> ttyymmnn
04/13/2016 at 17:40 |
|
That’s a osha violation. No guard on the belts running those lathes.
Party-vi
> ttyymmnn
04/13/2016 at 17:42 |
|
Ah, the early 1900s. When the men were men and the women were men.
hookitup
> ttyymmnn
04/13/2016 at 17:45 |
|
HNNNNNNNNNG!
|
ttyymmnn
> vondon302
04/13/2016 at 18:11 |
|
Osha, smosha, we got work to do.
e36Jeff now drives a ZHP
> Party-vi
04/13/2016 at 18:37 |
|
and the children were factory workers.
For Sweden
> ttyymmnn
04/13/2016 at 18:54 |
|
You won’t beat the Kaiser with only one arm
The Compromiser
> For Sweden
04/13/2016 at 21:18 |
|
It may take a little longer, but I think me with my one arm and a bunch of other swell guys, like one eyed Pete, left nut Larry, and two toes McGee, we can lick this Kaiser fella and all his Hunt. 23 skidoo, by Jingo!
|
Party-vi
> e36Jeff now drives a ZHP
04/13/2016 at 22:36 |
|
And also men!
facw
> ttyymmnn
04/14/2016 at 03:20 |
|
I’m sad that they are scrapping the Barry. Feels wrong for the Naval Museum to not have a ship. I get that a random cold-war destroyer is not worth the cost of preserving, but I wish they would have brought in something else to replace it. Given that they’ll never be able to get anything in there again (I think even an LCS would be too tall for the new bridge), it would have been nice if they could have secured a ship worth keeping (maybe Olympia, which is definitely noteworthy enough to warrant restoration, and is fairly neglected).
|
ttyymmnn
> facw
04/14/2016 at 18:43 |
|
I hadn’t heard that story, so I did a little reading. Yes, it’s sad, and a little silly, that a Navy museum won’t have a ship. But judging from the problems they are having with USS Texas down at the San Jacinto Monument. It can be terribly expensive to keep a ship sitting in the water.